|
So I fired up my newly installed iTunes collection and looked through material. It was actually very interesting. For example, the Ultravox Rage in Eden album had bpm values from 73bpm to 150bpm, and many tracks were 140bpm or more. In many cases the tracks sounded faster than the actual bpm value, using all kinds of classical tricks such as syncopation. And this was true of many other similar albums of this time. Now, it seems we are stuck in the 128bpm rot in the concurrent electronic music, especially in the dance music world. Maybe it’s a practical issue concerning the dancing audience and having the option to increase the bpm during the mix. But it’s for me a little bit sad that we don’t really make use of various tempos in music today. It seems few dare to change this model. Anyway, especially if someone is working on an album, I would strongly recommend to just break all the rules and use tempos from 60pm up to 180bpm. That would be refreshing. Now, having even radical tempo changes along the track would be even more intriguing. Classical composers used tempo changes, even microscopic ones, along their compositions. While we are locked to a fixed tempo, ack.
Comments:
2 Comments posted on "What Happened with Electronic Music and Multiple Tempos?"
Steve on January 1st, 2008 at 8:42 pm #
You can still find BPM variety here and there. I think the lack of tempo variety in electronic dance music in general has a few other reasons:
JimArea on January 3rd, 2008 at 8:01 am #
I agree with Steve to a point. There are plenty of electronic and dance acts that make music not just boops and beeps. If you use Live then tempo change is no big deal at all. Post a comment
|